So, I'm getting into the groove with this benchmarking thing. I have an optimised set up for 2D and 3D benchmarks, and over the week have benched the following:
CPUs:
Core i7 920 D0
GPUs: (w/ Core i7 920 D0 @ 4.1Ghz)
X550 256mb
X800 XL
X1900 XT
4670
2x4670 in CF
4850
2x4850 in CF
GTX 280
And thus the following results were garnered:
2D Stock:
2D Overclocked:
2D Combined:
3D Overall:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/10c59/10c59d696c50c985c7f28c4ba3ee0a3a46ce6b36" alt=""
3D OC vs. OC, Stock vs. Stock:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/240c3/240c3218f8a9b61c9ffcd46bd4bf4167e7194d94" alt=""
In all graphs, the higher score is better :)
Calculation of 2D scores:
a) Take the highest time for test X out of my hardware
b) Divide each CPU time by highest time = score
c) Add all scores together for all tests
Calculation of 3D scores:
a) Take the best score for test X out of my hardware
b) Divide each test score by highest score, make a %
c) Add all % for all tests, max 500 points.
Interesting observations:
- The Core i7 blasts an overclocked Core 2 Duo E6400 out of the water.
- One 4670 isn't that good at gaming, however 2x4670 at stock beats a 4850 at stock.
- The GTX 280 is better at older benchmarks. However, 2x4850 at stock beats the GTX280 overclocked for a cheaper price.
No comments:
Post a Comment